logo

Harbingers’ Magazine is a weekly online current affairs magazine written and edited by teenagers worldwide.

harbinger | noun

har·​bin·​ger | \ˈhär-bən-jər\

1. one that initiates a major change: a person or thing that originates or helps open up a new activity, method, or technology; pioneer.

2. something that foreshadows a future event : something that gives an anticipatory sign of what is to come.

cookie_image

We and our partners may store and access personal data such as cookies, device identifiers or other similar technologies on your device and process such data to personalise content and ads, provide social media features and analyse our traffic.

introduction image

Two-thirds of US abortions are carried out using mifepristone and misoprostol.

Picture by: Brigette Supernova | Alamy

Article link copied.

Pro-life activists criticise the FDA’s approval of a new abortion drug

author_bio
Sophie Rytel in New Jersey, US

16-year-old Sophie explains the rising tensions between anti-abortion and pro-choice activists in the US

The Federal Drug Administration’s (FDA) unpublicised decision to approve a generic version of the abortion drug mifepristone resulted in the White House becoming a target of severe criticism from anti-abortion groups. They accused Trump of failing to take visible action regarding abortion restrictions since the 2024 elections.

In late September, the FDA approved a request from Evita Solutions to manufacture mifepristone pills, making it the third company in the US allowed to manufacture the drug. A branded version of the pill was first approved in 2000, with a generic version approved in 2019. The FDA explained that its review of the drug is directed by scientific evidence and established safety standards, independent from political considerations and pressures.

However, the approval increases the supply of anti-abortion drugs for women, essentially countering the abortion-restricting laws set by the United States after the Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade in June 2022. This ended the constitutional right to abortion that had been in place since 1973.

According to The New York Times, two out of three of the nation’s terminations are completed using abortion drugs (mifepristone in combination with misoprostol) and the overall numbers have remained largely unchanged since the Supreme Court’s ruling.

The FDA is receiving criticism and backlash from anti-abortion supporters. Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said:“These dangerous drugs take the lives of unborn children, place women and underage girls at serious risk, empower abusers, and trample the pro-life laws enacted by states across the nation.”

Activists claim that mifepristone is unsafe and dangerous, and are campaigning to remove the drug from the market, spreading misinformation. Anti-abortion supporters have quoteda paper from the right-wing think tank Ethics and Public Policy Center, which claimed that within the first 45 days of taking mifepristone, 11% of women experience side effects and complications, a claim that was found not to be supported or reviewed by any medical institution.

In fact, there are more than 100 studies proving mifepristone’s safety. Yet, anti-abortion supporters continue to claim and disregard the FDA’s ability to review the drug’s safety.

Pro-choice activists have been praising the FDA for the approval of the abortion pill, highlighting the scientific and social benefits. During an interview with ABC news, Kiki Freedman, co-founder and CEO of the telemedicine abortion provider Hey Jane, said:

“At a time when politically motivated attacks threaten to undermine science and restrict care, it’s critical to underscore that the science couldn’t be clearer.”

The FDA’s decision has been deeply divisive, resulting in a political firestorm. Students for Life Action, a youth pro-life organisation, called the FDA’s decision “a stain on Trump’s presidency”.

While abortion policies are meant to be a matter for states to decide individually, the right-wing MAGA base expects the federal government to undercut means of making abortions more accessible nationwide. The growing supply of abortion drugs goes directly against the laws set in place in right-wing states, creating further political tensions between pro-life and pro-choice activists.

Furthermore, women are using websites and networks to send abortion pills through the mail across state lines. According to the New York Times, due to Trump’s lack of action on this issue, anti-abortion groups began working on tracking abortion pills in wastewater. Their goal is to develop technology that allows them to track abortion pill use to a specific area or street.

The controversy about abortion has existed since the mid-19th century, based on religious and scientific beliefs. Abortion rights in particular have played a big part in political tensions during recent presidential elections. The FDA’s approval of this drug shows how abortion continues to be a divisive issue and exemplifies the ongoing political tensions.

Written by:

author_bio

Sophie Rytel

Contributor

New Jersey, US

Born in 2009 in Moscow, Russia, Sophie Rytel studies in New Jersey, United States. She is interested in journalism and plans to study humanities-related subjects in the future, but isn’t sure yet.

Sophie plays volleyball, swims and rows on a lake; she also enjoys writing and drawing. In her free time, she watches Fast&Furious movies.

Sophie speaks Polish and English.

Edited by:

author_bio

Lola Kadas

Society Section Editor 2025

Budapest, Hungary

human rights

🌍 Join the World's Youngest Newsroom—Create a Free Account

Sign up to save your favourite articles, get personalised recommendations, and stay informed about stories that Gen Z worldwide actually care about. Plus, subscribe to our newsletter for the latest stories delivered straight to your inbox. 📲

Login/Register